Appendix 21-G
Sample Contents of A BERA Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan and BERA Report
Contents of a BERA Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan
(see Subsection 21.6.3 and Subsection 21.6.4 for guidance on preparing the BERA Report)
| 1.0 | INTRODUCTION | |||
| 2.0 | REFINED PROBLEM FORMULATION | |||
| 2.1 | Environmental Setting, COPCs, and Receptors of Concern | |||
| 2.2 | Assessment and Measurement Endpoints | |||
| 2.3 | Refined Conceptual Site Model | |||
| 2.4 | Identification of Decision Units | |||
| 3.0 | STUDY DESIGN AND DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVE PROCESS | |||
| 3.1 | Data Quality Objectives | |||
| 3.1.1 | Problem Definition | |||
| 3.1.2 | Decision Statement | |||
| 3.1.3 | Inputs to the Decision | |||
| 3.1.4 | Study Boundaries | |||
| 3.1.5 | Decision Rules | |||
| 3.1.6 | Limits on Decision Errors | |||
| 3.2 | Sampling Design | |||
| 3.2.1 | Sample Analytics | |||
| 3.2.2 | Sediment Sampling | |||
| 3.2.3 | Pore Water Sampling | |||
| 3.2.4 | Surface Water Sampling | |||
| 3.2.5 | Biological Surveys | |||
| 3.2.6 | Field-Collected Tissue Samples | |||
| 3.2.7 | Laboratory Toxicity Tests | |||
| 3.2.8 | Laboratory Bioaccumulation Studies | |||
| 4.0 | References Cited | |||
| Tables | ||||
| Figures | ||||
| Appendices | ||||
CONTENTS OF A BERA REPORT
(see Subsection 21.6.3 for guidance on preparing the BERA WP/SAP)
| 1.0 | INTRODUCTION | ||||||
| 1.1 | INVESTIGATORY HISTORY | ||||||
| 1.2 | OVERVIEW OF THE ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS | ||||||
| 1.3 | REPORT ORGANIZATION | ||||||
| 2.0 | SCREENING LEVEL ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT | ||||||
| 2.1 | DATA SOURCES AND ASSUMPTIONS USED IN THE SLERA | ||||||
| 2.1.1 | STEP 1: SCREENING LEVEL SITE CHARACTERIZATION DATA AND ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS EVALUATION | ||||||
| 2.1.2 | STEP 2: ESTIMATE PRELIMINARY EXPOSURE CONCENTRATIONS AND CALCULATE HAZARD QUOTIENTS | ||||||
| 2.2 | SLERA PROBLEM FORMULATION | ||||||
| 2.2.1 | BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES AT THE SITE | ||||||
| 2.2.1.1 | MARINE ALGAE AND VEGETATION | ||||||
| 2.2.1.2 | MARINE INVERTEBRATES | ||||||
| 2.2.1.3 | MARINE AND ESTUARINE FISHES | ||||||
| 2.2.1.4 | SEA TURTLES | ||||||
| 2.2.1.5 | MARINE BIRDS | ||||||
| 2.2.1.6 | MARINE MAMMALS | ||||||
| 2.2.1.7 | THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES | ||||||
| 2.2.2 | DESCRIPTION OF AVAILABLE DATA | ||||||
| 2.2.3 | DESCRIPTION OF ECOLOGICAL DECISION UNITS | ||||||
| 2.2.3.1 | DU-1 | ||||||
| 2.2.3.2 | DU-2 | ||||||
| 2.2.3.3 | DU-3 | ||||||
| 2.2.3.4 | REFERENCE LOCATION (FOR EACH DU, IF NECESSARY) | ||||||
| 2.2.4 | PRELIMINARY ECOLOGICAL CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL | ||||||
| 2.2.4.1 | CHEMICAL STRESSORS | ||||||
| 2.2.4.2 | NON-CHEMICAL STRESSORS | ||||||
| 2.2.4.3 | EXPOSURE PATHWAYS AND CRITICAL RECEPTORS | ||||||
| 2.2.5 | ASSESSMENT AND MEASUREMENT ENDPOINTS | ||||||
| 2.3 | SLERA EXPOSURE ESTIMATES AND RISK CALCULATIONS | ||||||
| 2.3.1 | DU-1 | ||||||
| 2.3.1.1 | SURFACE SEDIMENT | ||||||
| 2.3.1.2 | SURFACE WATER | ||||||
| 2.3.1.3 | HIGHER TROPHIC LEVEL RECEPTORS | ||||||
| 2.3.2 | DU-2 | ||||||
| 2.3.2.1 | SURFACE SEDIMENT | ||||||
| 2.3.2.2 | SURFACE WATER | ||||||
| 2.3.2.3 | HIGHER TROPHIC LEVEL RECEPTORS | ||||||
| 2.3.3 | DU-3 | ||||||
| 2.3.3.1 | SURFACE SEDIMENT | ||||||
| 2.3.3.2 | SURFACE WATER | ||||||
| 2.3.3.3 | HIGHER TROPHIC LEVEL RECEPTORS | ||||||
| 2.4 | SOURCES OF UNCERTAINTY IN THE SLERA | ||||||
| 2.4.1 | ANALYTICAL DATA | ||||||
| 2.4.2 | USE OF SCREENING VALUES | ||||||
| 2.4.3 | UNCERTAINTIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOOD-CHAIN MODEL (REVISE THESE TOPICS AS APPROPRIATE FOR YOUR SITE) | ||||||
| 2.4.3.1 | BSAFS | ||||||
| 2.4.3.2 | SITE USE FACTORS | ||||||
| 2.4.3.4 | DIETARY COMPOSITION | ||||||
| 2.4.3.5 | BIOAVAILABILITY | ||||||
| 2.4.3.6 | BODY WEIGHT AND INGESTION RATES | ||||||
| 2.4.3.7 | TOXICITY REFERENCE VALUES | ||||||
| 2.4.3.8 | INTERSPECIES EXTRAPOLATION | ||||||
| 2.4.3.9 | INDIVIDUAL AND POPULATION VARIATION | ||||||
| 2.4.3.10 | CHEMICALS WITHOUT TRVS | ||||||
| 2.4.3.11 | USE OF MAXIMUM DETECTED CONCENTRATION | ||||||
| 2.5 | SLERA SUMMARY AND SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT DECISION POINT | ||||||
| 3.0 | BERA PROBLEM FORMULATION | ||||||
| 3.1 | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONSIDERED IN THE BERA (THESE ARE EXAMPLE TOPICS; REVISE AS APPROPRIATE FOR YOUR SITE) | ||||||
| 3.1.1 | BACKGROUND/REFERENCE SEDIMENT ANALYSIS | ||||||
| 3.1.2 | ADDITIONAL SITE-SPECIFIC SEDIMENT CHEMICAL ANALYSIS | ||||||
| 3.1.2.1 | PAHS, INCLUDING ALKYLATED PAHS | ||||||
| 3.1.2.2 | AVS/SEM/TOC | ||||||
| 3.1.2.3 | SEDIMENT PORE WATER ANALYSIS | ||||||
| 3.1.3 | TOXICITY TESTS | ||||||
| 3.1.4 | SEDIMENT BIOACCUMULATION TEST | ||||||
| 3.1.5 | SITE-SPECIFIC BIOTIC SURVEYS | ||||||
| 3.1.5.1 | BENTHIC AND EPIBENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES | ||||||
| 3.1.5.2 | FISHES AND SEA TURTLES | ||||||
| 3.2 | REFINEMENT OF COMPLETE EXPOSURE PATHWAYS AND COPECS | ||||||
| 4.0 | ANALYSIS OF EXPOSURE AND EFFECTS | ||||||
| 4.1 | EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE | ||||||
| 4.1.1 | BENTHIC AND OTHER AQUATIC INVERTEBRATES | ||||||
| 4.1.1.1 | SEDIMENT BULK CHEMISTRY | ||||||
| 4.1.1.2 | PAHS, INCLUDING ALKYLATED PAHS | ||||||
| 4.1.1.3 | AVS AND SEM | ||||||
| 4.1.1.4 | SEDIMENT PORE WATER | ||||||
| 4.1.1.5 | SEDIMENT BIOASSAY RESULTS | ||||||
| 4.1.1.6 | FIELD-COLLECTED TISSUE SAMPLES | ||||||
| 4.1.1.7 | LABORATORY/FIELD BIOACCUMULATION TEST | ||||||
| 4.1.2 | EXPOSURE OF FISH TO CHEMICALS IN WATER AND SEDIMENT | ||||||
| 4.1.3 | DAILY INGESTED DOSES FOR BIRDS AND MAMMALS | ||||||
| 4.2 | EVALUATION OF EFFECTS | ||||||
| 4.2.1 | BENTHIC AND OTHER AQUATIC INVERTEBRATES | ||||||
| 4.2.1.1 | SEDIMENT BULK CHEMISTRY | ||||||
| 4.2.1.2 | AVS AND SEM RESULTS | ||||||
| 4.2.1.3 | SEDIMENT PORE WATER RESULTS | ||||||
| 4.2.1.4 | BIOASSAY RESULTS | ||||||
| 4.2.1.5 | FIELD COLLECTED INVERTEBRATE RESULTS | ||||||
| 4.2.1.6 | BIOASSAY AND BIOACCUMULATION RESULTS | ||||||
| 4.2.1.7 | EVALUATION OF CRITICAL BODY RESIDUE CONCENTRATIONS IN INVERTEBRATES | ||||||
| 4.2.2 | EFFECTS ON FISHES | ||||||
| 4.2.2.1 | EFFECTS OF SURFACE WATER ON FISH | ||||||
| 4.2.2.2 | FISH WHOLE BODY CONCENTRATIONS | ||||||
| 4.2.2.3 | FORAGE FISH BSAFS | ||||||
| 4.2.2.4 | BIOMAGNIFICATION OF CHEMICALS IN FISH | ||||||
| 4.2.2.5 | EVALUATION OF CRITICAL BODY RESIDUE TISSUE CONCENTRATIONS IN FISH | ||||||
| 4.2.3 | BIRDS AND MAMMALS | ||||||
| 4.2.3.1 | HQS BASED ON DAILY DOSE TRVS | ||||||
| 4.2.3.2 | EVALUATION OF CHEMICALS WITH NOAEL HQS GREATER THAN 1.0 | ||||||
| 5.0 | RISK DESCRIPTION | ||||||
| 5.1 | RISK TO BENTHIC AND OTHER AQUATIC INVERTEBRATES | ||||||
| 5.1.1 | DIRECT TOXICITY | ||||||
| 5.1.2 | BIOACCUMULATION | ||||||
| 5.2 | RISK TO FISH AND TURTLES | ||||||
| 5.2.1 | FISH SPECIES DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE | ||||||
| 5.2.2 | EFFECTS OF SURFACE WATER ON FISH | ||||||
| 5.2.3 | EVIDENCE FOR CHEMICAL BIOAVAILABILITY | ||||||
| 5.2.4 | BIOMAGNIFICATION OF CHEMICALS IN FISH | ||||||
| 5.2.5 | EVIDENCE FOR WHOLE BODY TISSUE EFFECTS | ||||||
| 5.2.6 | EVIDENCE FOR DIETARY EXPOSURE IN PISCIVOROUS FISH | ||||||
| 5.2.7 | FILLET CONCENTRATIONS IN TOP PREDATOR FISH | ||||||
| 5.2.8 | SUMMARY OF COPECS FOR FISH | ||||||
| 5.3 | RISK TO SEA TURTLES | ||||||
| 5.4 | RISK TO BIRDS | ||||||
| 5.4.1 | BIRD 1 | ||||||
| 5.4.2 | BIRD 2 | ||||||
| 5.4.3 | BIOAVAILABILITY OF CHEMICALS TO BIRDS | ||||||
| 5.5 | RISK TO MARINE MAMMALS | ||||||
| 5.5.1 | MARINE MAMMAL 1 | ||||||
| 5.5.2 | MARINE MAMMAL 2 | ||||||
| 5.5.3 | BIOAVAILABILITY OF CHEMICALS TO MARINE MAMMALS | ||||||
| 6.0 | RISK DESCRIPTION BY DECISION UNIT (SUMMARY TABLES) | ||||||
| 7.0 | UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS | ||||||
| 7.1 | COPEC SELECTION | ||||||
| 7.2 | EXPOSURE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS | ||||||
| 7.2.1 | RECEPTOR EXPOSURE FACTORS | ||||||
| 7.2.2 | BIOAVAILABILITY OF CHEMICALS | ||||||
| 7.2.3 | SPECIES AND INDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY IN EFFECT RESPONSES | ||||||
| 7.2.4 | INTERPRETATION OF INVERTEBRATE SCARCITY | ||||||
| 7.2.5 | INTERPRETATION OF BIOASSAY RESULTS | ||||||
| 7.3 | DATA GAPS | ||||||
| 7.3.1 | SEASONAL CHANGES IN SURFACE WATER CONCENTRATIONS | ||||||
| 7.3.2 | SURFACE WATER-GROUND WATER INTERACTIONS | ||||||
| 7.3.3 | BIOAVAILABILITY OF CHEMICALS | ||||||
| 7.3.4 | INVERTEBRATE PREY TISSUE CONCENTRATIONS | ||||||
| 8.0 | BERA SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS | ||||||
| 8.1 | SUMMARY OF RISK IN DU-1 | ||||||
| 8.1.1 | DIRECT EXPOSURE TO INVERTEBRATES IN DU-1 | ||||||
| 8.1.2 | BIOACCUMULATION IN DU-1 | ||||||
| 8.1.3 | INDIRECT EXPOSURE TO HIGHER TROPHIC LEVEL RECEPTORS IN DU-1 | ||||||
| 8.2 | SUMMARY OF RISK IN DU-2 | ||||||
| 8.2.1 | DIRECT EXPOSURE TO INVERTEBRATES IN DU-2 | ||||||
| 8.2.2 | BIOACCUMULATION IN DU-2 | ||||||
| 8.2.3 | INDIRECT EXPOSURE TO HIGHER TROPHIC LEVEL RECEPTORS IN DU-2 | ||||||
| 8.3 | SUMMARY OF RISK IN DU-3 | ||||||
| 8.3.1 | DIRECT EXPOSURE TO INVERTEBRATES IN DU-3 | ||||||
| 8.3.2 | BIOACCUMULATION IN DU-3 | ||||||
| 8.3.3 | INDIRECT EXPOSURE TO HIGHER TROPHIC LEVEL RECEPTORS IN DU-3 | ||||||
| 8.4 | SUMMARY OF COECS BY DU | ||||||
| 8.5 | SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF TOXIC SEDIMENTS | ||||||
| 9.0 | REFERENCES | ||||||
TABLES (THESE ARE EXAMPLES – REVISE AS APPROPRIATE FOR YOUR SITE)
| CHAPTER 2 TABLES | |||||||
| • | APPROXIMATE AREAS OF EXPOSURE UNITS | ||||||
| • | SLERA ASSESSMENT AND MEASUREMENT ENDPOINTS | ||||||
| • | SEDIMENT SCREENING VALUES | ||||||
| • | SURFACE WATER SCREENING VALUES | ||||||
| • | AVIAN TOXICITY REFERENCE VALUES | ||||||
| • | MAMMALIAN TOXICITY REFERENCE VALUES | ||||||
| • | SUMMARY OF HIGHEST SURFACE SEDIMENT HQS WITHIN EACH ANALYTICAL GROUP – DU-1 | ||||||
| • | SUMMARY OF SURFACE WATER HQS GREATER THAN 1.0 – DU-1 | ||||||
| • | MAXIMUM SLERA HQS FOR BIRDS AND MAMMALS – DU-1 | ||||||
| (REPEAT SET OF 3 TABLES ABOVE FOR EACH DU) | |||||||
| • | SLERA SUMMARY: DU-1 | ||||||
| • | SLERA SUMMARY: DU-2 | ||||||
| • | SLERA SUMMARY: DU-3 | ||||||
| CHAPTER 3 TABLES | |||||||
| • | DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF TARGET ORGANISMS AT THE SITE | ||||||
| • | BERA ASSESSMENT AND MEASUREMENT ENDPOINTS | ||||||
| CHAPTER 4 TABLES | |||||||
| • | HQS: SURFACE SEDIMENT UCL95/SCREENING CRITERION, DU-1 (REPEAT FOR EACH DU) | ||||||
| • | HQS: SURFACE WATER UCL95/SCREENING CRITERION, DU-1 (REPEAT FOR EACH DU) | ||||||
| • | SUMMARY OF ∑ SEM – AVS/ FOC RESULTS | ||||||
| • | SEDIMENT PORE WATER HAZARD QUOTIENTS | ||||||
| • | PAH POTENCY RATIOS IN SEDIMENT PORE WATER | ||||||
| • | BIOASSAY RESULTS | ||||||
| • | REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF POTENTIAL STRESSORS WITH BIOASSAY RESULTS | ||||||
| • | BIOTA-SEDIMENT ACCUMULATION FACTORS > 1.0 | ||||||
| • | BIOACCUMULATION, SURVIVAL, AND GROWTH RESULTS | ||||||
| • | BSAFS BASED ON LABORATORY BIOACCUMULATION | ||||||
| • | CRITICAL BODY RESIDUES IN INVERTEBRATES | ||||||
| • | SURFACE WATER HQS: FISH | ||||||
| • | FISH WHOLE BODY UCL95 CONCENTRATIONS BY DU AND GUILD | ||||||
| • | BERA HQS FOR BIRD 1 | ||||||
| • | BERA HQS FOR BIRD 2 | ||||||
| • | BERA HQS FOR MARINE MAMMAL 1 | ||||||
| • | BERA HQS FOR MARINE MAMMAL 2 | ||||||
| CHAPTER 5 TABLES | |||||||
| • | SUMMARY OF INVERTEBRATE MEASUREMENT ENDPOINT RESULTS | ||||||
| • | RELATIVE ELEVATED CONCENTRATIONS OF CHEMICALS IN FISH BY FORAGING GUILD AND DU | ||||||
| • | COPECS FOR FISH | ||||||
| • | DIETARY RISK TO BIRD 1 | ||||||
| • | DIETARY RISK TO BIRD 2 | ||||||
| • | DIETARY RISK TO BIRD 3 | ||||||
| • | DIETARY RISK TO MARINE MAMMAL 1 | ||||||
| • | DIETARY RISK TO MARINE MAMMAL 2 | ||||||
| CHAPTER 6 TABLES | |||||||
| • | BERA SUMMARY: DU-1 | ||||||
| • | BERA SUMMARY: DU-2 | ||||||
| • | BERA SUMMARY: DU-3 | ||||||
| • | SUMMARY OF COECS BY DU | ||||||
| • | SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF TOXIC SEDIMENTS AT THE SITE | ||||||
| • | LOCATIONS WARRANTING FURTHER INVESTIGATION | ||||||
FIGURES (THESE ARE EXAMPLES – REVISE AS APPROPRIATE FOR YOUR SITE)
| • | LOCATION OF DECISION UNITS | ||||||
| • | ECOLOGICAL CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL (PER DU, IF APPROPRIATE) | ||||||
| • | FOOD WEB OF SELECTED RECEPTORS | ||||||
| • | SURFACE SEDIMENT SAMPLING REFERENCE LOCATIONS | ||||||
| • | RESULTS OF SEDIMENT TOXICITY TESTS | ||||||
APPENDICES (THESE ARE EXAMPLES – REVISE AS APPROPRIATE FOR YOUR SITE)
| • | BERA WP/SAP | ||||||
| • | SPECIES KNOWN OR EXPECTED TO OCCUR AT THE SITE (WITH STATUS OF LEGAL PROTECTION) | ||||||
| • | ALL SCREENING AND DATA SUMMARIES | ||||||
| • | BIRD AND MAMMAL FOOD CHAIN MODELING
|
||||||